Ign ₳ Nat-m

Similar

Both of them are good grief remedies

Difference

• Even when not much time has passed, Nat-m looks at her grief as a memory. A memory that is reviewed regularly and bothers her.
• Ign has a sense of fresh encounter although a lot of time has passed, he does not feel time at all.
• Ign also feels that the matter is unsolvable, therefor he has continuous difficulty
• Ign always thinks that the problem cannot be solved. Therefore, the unsolved problem is continuously fresh and acute for him

• In Nat-m, the situation is completely different and reality belongs to the past in his opinion. Although this past may be yesterday, one prefers to live with this meaningful past.
• It doesn't make sense in Ign's past because he is stuck in that event and the loss belongs to the present time, even though it may have been several years since it happened. Of course, like other remedies, these situations are two ends of the spectrum that sometimes overlap each other, e.g., Nat-m sometimes has hysterical cries and Ign is sometimes used in acute attacks of Nat-m.
• If in doubt between them, give Ign first because it does not cause any problem to the patient.

• Nat-m is the result of a wound created after experiencing grief and feeling how difficult and hopeless life is. He looks at the matter with a philosophical-emotional view.
• But Ign is acute inflammation and looks at the matter with a delirious state and is usually stuck in the denial phase of mourning.